Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- From: "Mark Brinsmead" <pythianbrinsmead@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:37:30 -0600
Hmmm...
If you are using DataGuard, you need EE, don't you? I'm pretty sure that DG
has never been available with SE, although that *might* have changed with
11g. (I am pretty sure that looked when 11g was announced and I don't *
recall* seeing any changes to DG licensing rules. That doesn't mean they
weren't there, though.)
Now, while it is true that you don't *have* to license EE by CPU, you
*do*have to license a
*minumum* of 25 named users per CPU (with EE, that is), which means *at
least* the 50% of the cost of CPU licenses.
There's one other little matter. Last time I checked, you were required to
license your DG standby database with the *same licensing metric* as you
have for the primary. That is, if you use CPU licensing for the primary
database, you must use CPU licensing for the standby. Of course, nothing *
requires* you to have the same number of CPUs for the standby -- unless you
want to do something lavish, like load-testing or performance testing.
Bottom line: standby databases are generally far from free. Or -- in most
cases -- cheap.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:51 AM, dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx <
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And where was it said
> or implied it wasn't licensed?
> What it doesn't have to be is a
> full-on EE, CPU-based licence.
>
>
> On Mon Mar 17 20:03 , "Bradd Piontek" sent:
>
> >Am I missing something? Whether you are using dataguard or not, you need
> to
> license the test database.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:55 AM, LS Cheng <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >I am not sure how Mirrorview license works but with DG you pay per
> instance per
> CPU so it gets damn expensive.....
> >
> >
> >--
> >LSC
> >
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
-- Mark Brinsmead
Senior DBA,
The Pythian Group
http://www.pythian.com/blogs
Other related posts:
