RE: streams vs. replication
- From: "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:33:38 -0000
Joe,
from what little I know, you want at least 92060 to get
Streams stability, and 10g to get the full feature
set.
<market speak> They are moving from trigger-based replication.
The statement is "if you haven't committed to replication or
streams yet, pick Streams".
- Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Joe Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:33 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: streams vs. replication
List,
I need advice on how to approach a task. I need to "replicate" 6 tables
across 6 Sun Servers with of course their own oracle instance. This is
9iRel2, 9.2.0.5.0.
Any change made to any of the tables needs to be replicated to all the other
tables. This is just DML changes. These tables are small.
Should I use traditional Oracle Replication or tackle it with Oracle
Streams?
I realize from reading the manuals that replication is included within
Streams, but I just want to make sure that my approach is right.
Any advice is appreciated.
thanks.
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
