Re: standby redologs ?!!
- From: Ram Srinivasan <srinivasanram2004@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: premj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:40:07 -0400
Prem: You don't have to follow blindly the manuals. If you have 2 redo log
groups on the primary, 2 redo log groups on the secondary (standby) will
suffice.
Ram Srinivasan
================
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Prem <premj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Friends ,
> I have a question (sorry if I sound too naive) .
>
> 11gR2 manuals say : "The standby redo log must have at least one more redo
> log group than the redo log at the redo source database, for each redo
> thread at the redo source database."
>
> It means - we need 3 standby redo log groups on the standby db if there are
> 2 redo log groups on the primary db . why so ? what is the purpose of that
> one extra group ?
>
> Regards,
> ~ JP ~
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
Sincerely
Ram Srinivasan
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
