compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- From: hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Pedro Espinoza <raindoctor@xxxxxxxxx>, Oracle-L <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:09:13 +0000 (GMT)
Hi
After googling i came across this where the author
provides compelling arguments to use a third part
cluster
www.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris10/solaris_cluster.pdf
regards
Hrishy
P.S:Sorry i changed the subject line hoping that it
would catch more eyes apologies if i violated the
posting guidelines
--- Pedro Espinoza <raindoctor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1. there are various kind of clusters: single system
> image clusters
> (oracle rac falls under this category); high
> performance cluster
> (oracle claims rac is high
> performance);load-balancing cluster (oracle
> rac does this); high availability clusters (rac is
> ha as well).
>
> 2. some one has to manage services (say, cluster
> file system, nfs,
> oracle instance, interface, disks, sendmail, dns,
> etc). There is a way
> to manage syslog across all nodes: here comes evmd
> of tru64 cluster or
> of oracle rac.
>
> 3. If you want to manage only oracle rac instances,
> yes, you have no
> choice but to deploy oracle clusterware. If your
> organization has
> already deployed clusters supporting non-oracle
> related services, then
> go with a clusterware that is certified to be
> compatible with oracle
> clusterware.
>
>
> >
> > Does anybody know what the thrid party
> cluseterware
> > from Veritas SUN and IBM HACMP over and above what
> has
> > already been offered by Oracle for free.
> >
>
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
