Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- From: "bkaltofen@xxxxxx" <bkaltofen@xxxxxx>
- To: hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:58:27 +0100
For Solaris here:
* metalink 283107.1
<https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:370578799665160649::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,283107.1,1,1,1,helvetica>:
Configuring Solaris IP Multipathing (IPMP) for the Oracle 10g VIP
* metalink 368464.1
<https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOT&id=368464.1&blackframe=1>:
How to Setup IPMP as Cluster Interconnect
hrishy schrieb:
Hi
Thanks for the replies.
I have the FUD factor (as i only have a single RAC
implementation exp with just maintainence and
installation) for interviews thats why i am posing so
many questions.
Please where can i find information about interconnect
bonding and teaming
regards
Hrishy
--- LS Cheng <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
simple words
if Oracle Clusterware fencing is not reliable we
would have seen already
data corruptions issues
plus, RAC internally has algorithm to avoid data
corruptions when cache
fusion communications suffers problems
interconnect is not SPOF if you protect it with
bonding or teaming
I am not sure what is your point about LUNs but I
have been in many sites
and asking for 5 1GB LUNs does not seem problem at
all
Thanks
--
LSC
On Jan 17, 2008 3:14 PM, hrishy
<hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi
I am looking it from a prespective off SLA's
for ex the document mentions
a)Establishing dependencies between clusterware
storage and RAC databases to ensure that the
shutdown
in the correct sequence.The sun clusterware allows
the
oracle clusterware to be stopped before the
filesystems are stopped.
b)It also suggests that there is a scope for
oracle
clusterware to evict a node and yet not reboot it
immedaitely .The remaning nodes start recovering
the
transactions however the evicted continues to
write to
the datafiles during the period of eviction to the
point where it falls down to the boot prompt it
will
lead to corruption
There are some other points
Like
a)interconnect connect being single point of
failure
b)How to provision voting disks and OCR should i
ask
the storage admins to carve out 5 1GB LUNS so i
can
mirror them ?
c)Would the storage admin object if i ask 5 1GB
luns
to be carved out for me as mostly they allocate
LUNS
of 64 GB 100Gb etc
regards
Hrishy
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox
http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
Other related posts:
- » compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » RE: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » RE: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » RE: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
- » Re: compelling arguments for a ThirdParty Cluster
Hi Thanks for the replies. I have the FUD factor (as i only have a single RAC implementation exp with just maintainence and installation) for interviews thats why i am posing so many questions. Please where can i find information about interconnect bonding and teaming regards Hrishy --- LS Cheng <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
simple words if Oracle Clusterware fencing is not reliable we would have seen already data corruptions issues plus, RAC internally has algorithm to avoid data corruptions when cache fusion communications suffers problems interconnect is not SPOF if you protect it with bonding or teaming I am not sure what is your point about LUNs but I have been in many sites and asking for 5 1GB LUNs does not seem problem at all Thanks -- LSC On Jan 17, 2008 3:14 PM, hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi I am looking it from a prespective off SLA's for ex the document mentions a)Establishing dependencies between clusterware storage and RAC databases to ensure that theshutdownin the correct sequence.The sun clusterware allowstheoracle clusterware to be stopped before the filesystems are stopped. b)It also suggests that there is a scope fororacleclusterware to evict a node and yet not reboot it immedaitely .The remaning nodes start recoveringthetransactions however the evicted continues towrite tothe datafiles during the period of eviction to the point where it falls down to the boot prompt itwilllead to corruption There are some other points Like a)interconnect connect being single point offailureb)How to provision voting disks and OCR should iaskthe storage admins to carve out 5 1GB LUNS so icanmirror them ? c)Would the storage admin object if i ask 5 1GBlunsto be carved out for me as mostly they allocateLUNSof 64 GB 100Gb etc regards Hrishy
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inboxhttp://uk.mail.yahoo.com-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l