Re: ** adv replication versus streams
- From: "GovindanK" <gkatteri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ajoshi977@xxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:45:25 -0700
Hello Joshi
What is the volume involved when you say slow. I have been working with
Adv.Replication and i can vouch for it.
What platform? How many master's involved? If you search for streams in this
forum few months ago, you will
find there was a bug with Streams where in it could not catch up with when the
volume/log switching was pretty
high and was found to be a bug. I have worked extensively but i would say
Streams is much easier to set up
and get started. It mines the logs unlike Replication.
HTH
GovindanK
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:09:30 -0700 (PDT), "A Joshi" <ajoshi977@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Hi,
> I have adv replication (multi master) but it is slow : so I am thinking
> of going to streams. For speed. Do I need to keep anything else in mind
> before going to streams? Any other comparison between the two for other
> aspects like maintenance. How stable is streams now. I think initially
> with 9i it was not stable and lot of bugs/issues. I would be going from
> 10g to 9i. Any issues with that. Any info is apreciated. Thanks for help.
>
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
