Re: Why should we assume LD_ASSUME_KERNEL during oracle product installation?

Hi Jared,

Yes you are right!!..you could have re-directed me to google if you
didnt want to give suggestions, Thanks for your valuable reply. But my
question in general is why in some case we assume LD_ASSUME_KERNEL.
are there any particular reason?.

I don't understand this sentence.  It seems to imply that you don't think
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is necessary with 10g.

Yes I thought the same that 10g doesnot require any Kernel assumptions.
Correct me if iam wrong.

reg,
Anand

On 5/17/07, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 5/17/07, Anand <shastry17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello all,
> Why should we assume LD_ASSUME_KERNEL with some value during oracle
> installation. Is that because the kernel versions are different for
> different operating system's and oracle works on specific Kernel
> version to enable glibc optimizations or are there any core reasons
> for this?. Please let me know on this.

Rather than cut and paste from Werner's informative website, I will direct
you to google for it. Googling for LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Oracle brought up
the answer in the first 2 hits.

> Also RHAS4 has 2.6 kernel, maybe that's the reason why the
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL issue has disappeared.

No, Oracle 9 requires this with the 2.6 Kernel.

> The 10.2.0.1's oraenv script does still have LD_LIBRARY_PATH in it.
> Please give me your sugesstions.


I don't understand this sentence.  It seems to imply that you don't think
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is necessary with 10g.


--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: