Sorry, obviously my numbers (TB column) were wrong. This is the new one: CACHE_READ_BYTES CACHE_READ_BYTES_TB STARTUP_TIME UPTIME_DAYS UPTIME_SECONDS BYTES_PER_SEC ---------------- ------------------- --------------------- ----------- -------------- ------------- 2.5E+16 22718.03589 16.12.2012 18:11:49 58.17 5025692 4970209998 So it's 4,970,209,998 Bytes per second overall. Fairly less than yours. :) Background: This is a devel DB, so usually they are doing fuzzy stuff. Martin Klier schrieb: >> It's over 100MB/s, which my knee jerk (emphasis on the latter) tells me that >> this seems abnormally high for our li'l DB. >> >> I'm curious to see how that number compares to other installations, if folks >> are willing. > > This heavily depends on the quality of your execution plans - have a > look at SQL "SQL ordered by Buffer Gets" in AWR/Statspack reports. I > don't think that number to be abnormally high... > > The DB is less than 2TB. Regards Martin Klier -- Usn's IT Blog for Linux, Oracle, Asterisk http://www.usn-it.de -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l