Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dubey.sandeep@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:17:12 +0100
On 9/28/06, Sandeep Dubey <dubey.sandeep@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have a document processing system on Oracle 10.2 Linux. It stores
document as blob in the database. We store 1 Million docs a month and
current table size is 5 million. Database size is 50 GB out of which
blob table takes 35 GB. (It is not partitioned).
<snip>
What could be challenge in storing it on file system? Any major
disadvantage that I should not consider it at all?
Thanks
Are the BLOB's transactional in anyway, especially are they subject to
change? If so then consistent recovery requirements might be overly
complicated.
My personal preference for files is to store them on filesystems with a
pointer to them in the DB (either a BFILE or else just a straight uri for
them)
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- From: Nuno Souto
- References:
- Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- From: Sandeep Dubey
Other related posts:
- » Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- » RE: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
I have a document processing system on Oracle 10.2 Linux. It stores document as blob in the database. We store 1 Million docs a month and current table size is 5 million. Database size is 50 GB out of which blob table takes 35 GB. (It is not partitioned).
disadvantage that I should not consider it at all?
Thanks
Are the BLOB's transactional in anyway, especially are they subject to change? If so then consistent recovery requirements might be overly complicated.
- Re: Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- From: Nuno Souto
- Storing blobs in database vs filesystem
- From: Sandeep Dubey