Re: Statspack consolidation
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: daniel.hubler@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:55:14 -0400
On 4/29/05, daniel.hubler@xxxxxxxxxx <daniel.hubler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We are contemplating creating a single Statpack database, on one
> server/instance,
> and pushing all of our Statspack data to it. This would probably include
> data from 7-8 instances.
> We are guessing that we are not the first to consider this.
>=20
> Does anyone have any guidelines/comments/horror stories/direction to giv=
e
> on this idea?
>=20
> Any thoughts appreciated!
Approach it like supporting rman catalogs:
one schema per supported version within the same database, e.g.:
perfstat817
perfstat920
perfstat101
you're going to have to disable constraints during import if you use exp/im=
p.
beware of using direct=3Dy with exp on 10.1.0.3 (bug).
partitioning the larger tables would be an excellent idea.
perhaps you might even want to export the data as a transportable tablespac=
e.
I looked at this long ago, but then was cured of CTD so I never completed i=
t.
Paul
--=20
#/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop
-- f=3Dma, divide by 1, convert to moles.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Statspack consolidation
- From: Vlado Barun
- Re: Statspack consolidation
- From: Tim Gorman
- References:
- Statspack consolidation
- From: daniel . hubler
Other related posts:
- » Statspack consolidation
- » Re: Statspack consolidation
- » RE: Statspack consolidation
- » Re: Statspack consolidation
- » RE: Statspack consolidation
- » Re: Statspack consolidation
- » RE: Statspack consolidation
- » Re: Statspack consolidation
- RE: Statspack consolidation
- From: Vlado Barun
- Re: Statspack consolidation
- From: Tim Gorman
- Statspack consolidation
- From: daniel . hubler