Re: Setting db_32k_cache_size breaks 11.1.0.7

There are lots of parameters that exist that only work on certain
platforms but are visible on all.

You are correct, it shouldnt crash - file a bug with support on that.

If you are using MSMM and not ASMM (sga_target/memory_target), and you
try and start up your database with db_32k_cache_size >0, it  mentions
that 16k is the max supported size:

SQL> ORA-00382: 32768 not a valid block size, valid range [2048..16384]

Personally I dont use ASMM on Linux because it doesnt support the use
of hugepages, only old school manually segment management does
currently.



On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Andre van Winssen <dreveewee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> But what about below
>
> SQL> show parameter k_cache_size
>
> NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
> ------------------------------------ ----------- -----
> db_16k_cache_size                    big integer 0
> db_2k_cache_size                     big integer 0
> db_32k_cache_size                    big integer 0 <<
> db_4k_cache_size                     big integer 0
> db_8k_cache_size                     big integer 0
>
> appearantly db_32k_cache_size is an allowed value.
>
> more importantly: oracle database should never crash because of this request
> to add a 32K buffer cache. It should say: sorry pal, I can't support this
> request for a 32k buffer cache. No, instead it crashes and we have to pick
> up the pieces.


-- 
Regards,
Greg Rahn
http://structureddata.org
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: