RE: Rollback waiting on 'cache buffer chains' latch

  • From: "Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Andrey.Kriushin@xxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:58:56 -0500

Hmm...then I'd say it's not really there, and something didn't get
cleaned up correctly when the background process either exited or
died..... 


--
Mark J. Bobak
Senior Oracle Architect
ProQuest Information & Learning

There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which shouldn't be
done at all.  -Peter F. Drucker, 1909-2005


-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Brandon [mailto:Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:58 PM
To: Bobak, Mark; Andrey.Kriushin@xxxxxxxx; oracle-l
Subject: RE: Rollback waiting on 'cache buffer chains' latch

Yes, looking at spid:

SQL> select b.spid from v$session a, v$process b where a.paddr=b.addr
and a.sid=664;

SPID
------------
9859284 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 


Are you looking at V$PROCESS.PID or V$PROCESS.SPID?


-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Brandon [mailto:Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx]

But the PID doesn't even exist according to the OS:

gbtbaan01.baan4 /baan4/admin/udump ->ps -ef|grep 9859284
  oracle  7315490  7422166   0 15:51:24 pts/192  0:00 grep 9859284 

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to
the official business of this company shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.

--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: