Re: Referential indexes
- From: Thomas Day <tomday2@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:40:58 -0500
But the foreign key has to be the LEADING column(s), yes?
I have a foreign key on a compound primary key but the foreign keyed
column is the second column in the primary key index. Am I right to
think that updates will not use the index and that I will have locking
issues?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Terry Sutton
- References:
- RE: Referential indexes
- From: Leonard, George
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Terry Sutton
Other related posts:
- » Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » RE: Referential indexes
- » RE: Referential indexes
- » RE: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Terry Sutton
- RE: Referential indexes
- From: Leonard, George
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Terry Sutton