Re: Referential indexes
- From: "Terry Sutton" <terrysutton@xxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:02:33 -0800
I believe that's the case, although you won't necessarily have locking
issues. But there is potential.
--Terry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Day" <tomday2@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Referential indexes
But the foreign key has to be the LEADING column(s), yes?
I have a foreign key on a compound primary key but the foreign keyed
column is the second column in the primary key index. Am I right to
think that updates will not use the index and that I will have locking
issues?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: Referential indexes
- From: Leonard, George
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Terry Sutton
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Thomas Day
Other related posts:
- » Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » RE: Referential indexes
- » RE: Referential indexes
- » RE: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- » Re: Referential indexes
- RE: Referential indexes
- From: Leonard, George
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Terry Sutton
- Re: Referential indexes
- From: Thomas Day