RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Deepak Sharma <sharmakdeep_oracle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:37:07 -0800 (PST)
Doesn't a 1 TeraByte of archived log backup (ask the
admins) seem a lot of activity for 1 day ?
Anyways, we are getting side-tracked from the main
question about placement of the online redo logs.
I think I got the answer that Raid 10 is ok.
Thanks,
Deepak
--- Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>The question relates to placing the 'online redo
> logs'.
> >>>Based on the current activity, the 'archived redo
> logs'
> >>>amount to ~960G a day.
>
> That's only 11MB/sec... averages over 24hours leave
> a lot
> of information off the table.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Sriram Kumar
- References:
- RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Kevin Closson
Other related posts:
- » Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Sriram Kumar
- RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Kevin Closson