Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:52:03 -0800
On 1/10/06, Joseph Amalraj <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think you are saying redo instead on undo.
>
> 800GB/day is quite a lot. It depends on whether
> your i/o subsystem can sustain this throughput. This can be found out
> from the storage vendor.
>
This could be redo.
It's certainly possible for a large busy system to generate that much redo
in a day.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Deepak Sharma
- References:
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Edgar Chupit
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Joseph Amalraj
Other related posts:
- » Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » RE: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- » Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Deepak Sharma
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Edgar Chupit
- Re: Redo Log Placement - RAID 10 ok?
- From: Joseph Amalraj