Re: RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values

From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:21:07 -0600

So these issues ARE specific to RAC. Good to know. Not that I want to go 
to RAC if I can help it - "I probably don't need RAC" - and for my money 
I'd take out the 'probably".

rjamya wrote:
> db_file_multiblock_read_count ... unless the bug has been fixed, you
> could lot of issues with global_cache_reads since they used teh
> dbfmbrc parameter too.  Since most of these (global*) are related to
> clustered database that's why I specified RAC.
> 
> How do I know? been there, suffered, logged bug, was told the
> solution. The problem disappeared.
> 
-- 
Regards

Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

References:

RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values
From: Levesque, Roger

Re: RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values
From: rjamya

Re: RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values
From: Wolfgang Breitling

Re: RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values
From: rjamya

Re: RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values

Other related posts: