Re: RTFM: Oracle 10g OS-specific default values
- From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:36:02 -0400
db_file_multiblock_read_count ... unless the bug has been fixed, you
could lot of issues with global_cache_reads since they used teh
dbfmbrc parameter too. Since most of these (global*) are related to
clustered database that's why I specified RAC.
How do I know? been there, suffered, logged bug, was told the
solution. The problem disappeared.
Raj
On Apr 7, 2005 11:45 AM, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> a) are you talking about mbrc or db_file_multiblock_read_count?
>
> b) 4 seems an awfully small number to me. I personally like 128 or
> greater (but I'm not using RAC). What are the "issues" you refer to when
> mbrc>4 ? Are those specific to RAC?
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
