Re: RE: Oracle 13
- From: kellyn.potvin@xxxxxxxxx
- To: "Adams, Matthew (GE, Appl & Light)" <MATT.ADAMS@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:53:04 +0300
I have to admit, I can't wait for Oracle 13 and EM13c... 13 is my lucky
number!! :)
Sent from myMail for iOS
>
>Thursday, November 6, 2014, 11:33 AM -0700 from Adams, Matthew (GE, Appl &
>Light) <MATT.ADAMS@xxxxxx>:
>No, roman numerals are definitely the way they should go here.
>
>I want to see Oracle XIII…seems more sinister somehow, which makes that much
>more appropriate
>
>From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of David Fitzjarrell
>Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 1:02 PM
>To: sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Oracle 13
>
>They could use hex:
>
>Oracle D
>
>or octal which puts us back to:
>
>Oracle 15
>
>Or maybe binary:
>
>Oracle 1101
>
>Maybe use base 9:
>
>Oracle 14
>
>Base 11 wouldn't work, though:
>
>Oracle 12
>
>How about base 7:
>
>Oracle 16
>
>The possibilities could be endless.
>
>David Fitzjarrell
>
>Principal author, "Oracle Exadata Survival Guide"
>
>On Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:17 AM, Stéphane Faroult <
>sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
>
>I agree with Tim that it's about marketing and not arithmetic. The
>trouble is that nobody can ignore the Chinese market these days, and
>Oracle 14 will definitely not do in China (no 14th floor in Hong Kong),
>and the Chinese attach even more importance to numbers than westerners.
>Will we skip for Oracle 12Rn to Oracle 15? Talk of a "mature" product ...
>
>Stéphane Faroult
>--
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
- » Re: RE: Oracle 13 - kellyn . potvin
