Re: Performance problems after moving to new hardware
- From: Sandra Becker <sbecker6925@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Mark Burgess <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:27:50 -0700
We migrated from a Dell platform.
Sandy
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Mark Burgess <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> Hi Sandra,
>
> What was the hardware platform that you migrated this system from? Was it
> T5 or other?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
> > On 5 Mar 2015, at 12:25 am, Sandra Becker <sbecker6925@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > OS: Solaris Sparc 10 (64-bit)
> > Oracle: EE 11.2.0.2
> >
> > The OS and Oracle versions are identical on both the old and new
> servers. Storage attached to the new server is a new EMC disk array.
> Sorry I don't have any more details on the storage and the only additional
> information I have on the server is that it is a T5.
> >
> > We created a standby on the new hardware and did a switchover last
> Friday night. On Saturday I completed gathering stats on the application
> schema tables as requested by the product manager. As usual, very little
> activity on this database over the weekend. Yesterday morning we were
> contacted by internal users that performance was much worse than on the old
> hardware for a specific query on a really ugly view. A look at the
> execution plan shows multiple full table scans on some partitioned tables,
> some very large. There are about 15 tables joined to create the view, some
> more than once. They claim the view is no longer doing partition pruning,
> as it did before the switchover. I can't prove that it was/wasn't
> exhibiting this behavior before the switchover. They are insisting we run
> I/O calibration. I'm not familiar with it so I went to the docs. This
> database shares storage with quite a few production databases so I want to
> be very careful how I go about this.
>
--
Sandy
GHX
Other related posts:
