Re: Oracle on Virtual Machines

  • From: "~Jeff~" <jifjif@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: tony_vanlingen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:07:12 +1200

We were evaluating this for a ct (in NZ, Oz) and they were looking at having
to license every core (or CPU) in the VM cluster that Oracle runs in ,
leading to the conclusion that Oracle would need it's own VM cluster(s) for
licensing reasons, rather than sharing a cluster with all the  app/web
servers and other rif-raf ;)
HTH -
Jeff

2009/6/11 Tony van Lingen <tony_vanlingen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Mmmm, that's interesting. We had a discussion here last week about this
> very topic. It appears that (at least here in Oz) one would have to licence
> every core for every installed virtual machine (with Oracle on it), so if
> you would install 2 VMs on a 4-core machine, you'd have to licence 16
> cores..
>
> Has anyone a definitive answer?
>
> Cheers,
> Tony
>
> Freeman, Donald wrote:
>
> Yes, my understanding is that you would have to buy 8 CPU's worth of licenses 
> for the 4 quad cores and you could create however many VM's the host could 
> handle. I am not very familiar with Oracle VM to speak to it's features.  We 
> (Commonwealth of PA) plunged an bought an Enterprise license for VMWare so 
> that's all we have. I don't know if Oracle has an equivalent to Vmotion but 
> if you've only got one VM host what are you going to use it for?  You don't 
> start getting the full benefit of a VM until you have a cluster and can 
> failover to another physical machine.
>
> You haven't escaped any of the organizational problems that you would 
> normally experience mixing production and development tiers. We have a 
> production VM cluster/SAN and a development VM cluster/SAN.  Just from an 
> administrative point of view in the event of a failure it's not good practice 
> to cripple both your developers and users with one issue.
>
> Donald Freeman
> Database Administrator II
> Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
> Department of Health
> Bureau of Information Technology
> 2150 Herr Street
> Harrisburg, PA 17103dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Subbiah, Nagarajan [mailto:Nagarajan.Subbiah@xxxxxxxx 
> <Nagarajan.Subbiah@xxxxxxxx>]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:15 AM
> To: Freeman, Donald; Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Oracle on Virtual Machines
>
> Hi Donald, Thanks. If we have the 4 Quad Core VM Host on Intel x86 platform, 
> once you purchase the 8 CPU license using Oracle Licensing Metric multiplier 
> (0.5/core for Intel) then we can have any number of VM with the any number 
> virtual CPUs. OR for every VM's virtual CPU, you need to buy the license for.
>
> Oracle VM is similar to VMWare? Does it have all the features of VMWare 
> (especially Vmotion)?
>
> Though the SQL server is out of the scope for discussion, Any cons you have 
> found of using SQL Server VMs combining both development,test and production 
> in a single physical server assuming enough hardware resources are in place. 
> We are looking at the options for SQL Server as well to consolidate 10s of 
> SQL Servers.
>
> Raja.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Freeman, Donald [mailto:dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx <dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:58 AM
> To: Subbiah, Nagarajan; Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Oracle on Virtual Machines
>
> There should be a long discussion on Oracle on VM in the May archives.
> Oracle discourages the use of VMWare through licensing restrictions which it 
> does not apply to itself if using Oracle VM.  You have to buy a license for 
> every CPU on the VM host whether or not you are using it. I think the Oracle 
> VM uses a config file to set the number of CPU's that Oracle uses.  We don't 
> have any production Oracle VM's but have some
> development on VM clusters.   We have a lot of production SQL Server
> VM's.
>
>
> Donald Freeman
> Database Administrator II
> Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
> Department of Health
> Bureau of Information Technology
> 2150 Herr Street
> Harrisburg, PA 17103dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On 
> Behalf Of Subbiah, Nagarajan
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:20 AM
> To: Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Oracle on Virtual Machines
>
> Hi List,
>
> Does Oracle support running the Oracle databases on VMs using SAN?
> Oracle also has something called Oracle VM. How does it different from Vmware 
> solutions?.
>
> Also, Looking to move the hardware from HP  PA RISC architecture to x86 using 
> Linux. What is the equivalent of 4 Dual Core PA8900 processeors compared to 
> the HP Machines especially DL-G Series.
>
> Any one has any experience of running production and development on same VM 
> host; Assuming enough hardware resources in place any pros/cons of sharing 
> the prod and dev on the same VM host?
>
> Thanks in Advance.
> Raja.
>
> --//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> --//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

Other related posts: