Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- From: mhthomas <qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: davewendelken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:30:02 -0500
in-line comments
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:17:13 -0500, David Wendelken
<davewendelken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
...
> Either the passwords have to be in a lockbox (or two?), or 4 dbas are
> needed.
>
...
You don't need 4 dbas in this scenario, only 2. If one or both of your
two dbas get a life and don't show up for work, all you need are two
sealed envelopes with the passwords. You assign two new dba's and
update the passwords, and make two more sealed envelopes. Remember,
its an audit, not muclar nissles. ;-)
There has to be a joke in here somewhere... :-)
Regards,
Mike Thomas
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- From: Chip Briggs
- RE: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- From: David Wendelken
Other related posts:
- » OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » RE: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » RE: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » RE: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- » Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- Re: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- From: Chip Briggs
- RE: OT - SarBox paranoia prevention ?
- From: David Wendelken