Yes, that would be the 'real good reason why we are not'. On Jan 15, 2008 11:58 AM, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 8:47 AM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I have seen something along those lines before. Having spent more time > > than I like to think about patching, and then unpatching when the errors > > show up, I can sympathize with those who have not done it. On the other > > hand, with Sox compliance being such a big issue these days, I feel like we > > either need to be up to the current CPU set , or have a real good reason why > > we are not. > > > > > The application can affect the patch level. > > We are on SAP 4.6, and just patched to April 2007 CPU, as that was all > that was > certified by SAP at the time. > > > -- > Jared Still > Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist > -- Andrew W. Kerber 'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'