Re: OT: Oracle Critical Patch Article
- From: "Andrew Kerber" <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:59:18 -0600
Yes, that would be the 'real good reason why we are not'.
On Jan 15, 2008 11:58 AM, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2008 8:47 AM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I have seen something along those lines before. Having spent more time
> > than I like to think about patching, and then unpatching when the errors
> > show up, I can sympathize with those who have not done it. On the other
> > hand, with Sox compliance being such a big issue these days, I feel like we
> > either need to be up to the current CPU set , or have a real good reason why
> > we are not.
> >
> >
> The application can affect the patch level.
>
> We are on SAP 4.6, and just patched to April 2007 CPU, as that was all
> that was
> certified by SAP at the time.
>
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>
--
Andrew W. Kerber
'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
Other related posts:
