Re: Multiplex Redo Logs with Mirrored Disks?

  • From: "Terry Sutton" <terrysutton@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "ORACLE-L (E-mail)" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:08:09 -0800

It depends on what you call "need".  Remember that there can be issues other
than losing a drive.  Have you ever accidentally done a "rm *" in the wrong
directory?

--Terry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Wagoner" <dwagoner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ORACLE-L (E-mail)" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:46 AM
Subject: Multiplex Redo Logs with Mirrored Disks?


Is there any need to multiplex redo logs with mirrored disks (e.g., RAID-1
or RAID-1+0)?
Example- Oracle recommends multiplexing redo logs on separate disks, like
redo01a.log on Disk1 and redo01b.log on Disk2, etc.

However, now that mirrored disks are in common use with RAID-1+0, RAID-1,
etc. it seems that sufficient protection is in place to use only a single
copy of each redo log.  This would also provide the benefit of reduced disk
I/O to write redo information to disk.

Anyone disagree?


Best regards,

David B. Wagoner
Database Administrator




--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: