RE: Multiplex Redo Logs with Mirrored Disks?

=20
This protects you against a single disk failure but doesn't protect you
against other things, such as fat fingering a redo log or (in my case)
encountering a firmware bug in a controller that hoses a file system.

Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Wagoner
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:47 AM
To: ORACLE-L (E-mail)
Subject: Multiplex Redo Logs with Mirrored Disks?

Is there any need to multiplex redo logs with mirrored disks (e.g.,
RAID-1 or RAID-1+0)?
Example- Oracle recommends multiplexing redo logs on separate disks,
like redo01a.log on Disk1 and redo01b.log on Disk2, etc.

However, now that mirrored disks are in common use with RAID-1+0,
RAID-1, etc. it seems that sufficient protection is in place to use only
a single copy of each redo log.  This would also provide the benefit of
reduced disk I/O to write redo information to disk.

Anyone disagree?


Best regards,

David B. Wagoner
Database Administrator




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l





**DISCLAIMER
This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the =
use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain=
 information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you are n=
ot the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the =
message or any information contained in the message. If you have received t=
his communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail=
 message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to the ex=
tent that it relates to their official business.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: