RE: LOCALLY MANAGED EXTENT PERFORMANCE
- From: Wolfson Larry - lwolfs <lawrence.wolfson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Dogan, Ibrahim - Ibrahim" <Ibrahim.Dogan@xxxxxxxxx>, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:55:21 -0500
And I thought Oracle said you didn't have to worry about how many any more.
I didn't exactly blame LMTs I just said there were a lot of
extents.
Not my app.
Thanks for info
-----Original Message-----
From: Dogan, Ibrahim - Ibrahim [mailto:Ibrahim.Dogan@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 11:46 PM
To: Wolfson Larry - lwolfs; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED EXTENT PERFORMANCE
Do not use uniform sized LMTs for volatile tables since you may end up
having a table/index with thousand of extents..
More important, don't blame LMTs for it..
If you use AUTO extent allocation instead of uniform size, you won't
have problem...
Thanks,
Ibrahim DOGAN
Sr. Sybase/Oracle DBA
www.lowes.com
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged.
If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error,
please re-send this communication to the sender and
delete the original message or any copy of it from your
computer system. Thank You.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
