RE: Flash-only Metalink
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <sims@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:45:39 -0400
Would I be correct in summarizing that we're NOT opposed to the features of
the flash versions, but rather we (oracle-l in general) are opposed to
having zero widely available low bandwidth capable lifeline to support
available?
Please note that is a question, not an assertion.
I recommend registering your vote in Jared's poll, on mix, and through the
users groups to which you belong.
April, if you and John K are thinking about an article on this, that would
be great. Perhaps we can get Oracle to make superior choices about this for
all of us!
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of April Sims
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 11:00 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Flash-only Metalink
As one of the Alpha, Beta ....customers who Oracle consulted with during the
implementation of Oracle Configuration Manager, Flash version of Metalink,
etc.
I told them from the very first day...it is TOO slow! Constantly asked about
this being deployed across different desktops. What do people see if they
have no configurations uploaded, etc. Repeated myself every time we had a
meeting. Great concept in that you could filter everything based on your
hosts, configurations, etc.
Right now the biggest gotcha is seeing all the data associated with a single
CSI, my understanding is that group privileges are on the way.
April Sims
SELECT IOUG Contributing Editor
http://aprilcsims.wordpress.com
OCP 8i, 9i, 10g DBA
Southern Utah University
sims@xxxxxxx
940-484-4276
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
