Re: DBMS_SUPPORT Versions blues
- From: Paul Drake <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: jkstill@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:09:31 -0500
Jared,
I recall it not being included in the 8.1.7 distro for win32 and
having to download it as a patch - around the time that the 8.1.7.3.0
patchset was released.
that had a modify_date of 20020313.
I last downloaded that on 20021218.
Paul
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:24:39 -0800, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've noticed the same disparity, and have also not found a later version.
> Jared
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:13:06 -0500, Gogala, Mladen
> <mladen.gogala@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Being one of those DBA geeks who always install DBMS_SUPPORT, even in the
> > cases when I
> > have not been given a direct advice from the Oracle Support, I was
> > describing it to a colleague.
> > He asked me about the package version function, and I went to see what's in
> > it. Here is
> > what the function returns:
> > SQL> select dbms_support.package_version from dual;
> > PACKAGE_VERSION
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DBMS_SUPPORT Version 1.0 (17-Aug-1998) - Requires Oracle 7.2 - 8.0.5
> > SQL> select * from v$version;
> > BANNER
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
> > PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
> > CORE 9.2.0.3.0 Production
> > TNS for HPUX: Version 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
> > NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
> > SQL>
> > I may be wrong but 9.2.0.4.0 does not seem to fall in the required version
> > range.
> > Now, my question is whether there is a newer version. That is one of those
> > secretive undocumented packages described nowhere
> > except in little known books by Tom Kyte and Cary Millsap as well as in
> > about a 100 or so notes on Metalink (if you enter
> > DBMS_SUPPORT in the search field, then 127 results are found) and an article
> > in Oracle Magazine for Jan 04 (Cary's hand, again)
> > which means that it is only used by 50,000 or so database administrators in
> > the world. Now that the cat is out of the bag, it would
> > be nice to maintain it and add some new stuff, like the event 10053 and
> > something to show me the name of the tracefile without
> > resorting to oradebug.
> > Mladen Gogala
> Jared Still
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
