RE: Index rebuilding

  • From: Alex <stant_98@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: DGoulet@xxxxxxxx, oraclel@xxxxxxxxxx, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:44:04 -0800 (PST)

I agree with Dick! Always and never are to be used in
cases like "the sun always rises in the east: or "I've
never enjoyed working with Oracle more than I do now"
:)

Regards!

--- "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Looked at Richard Foote's paper.  Don't know about
> that.  I did prove to
> OTS several years ago that a block could get "lost"
> in an index due to
> deletion/updates that left it empty.  I believe that
> got finally fixed
> in Oracle 8i.  I've still seen cases of index's
> becoming unbalanced, I
> know the docs day it's impossible, but it does
> happen without the index
> height increasing. And I still believe that index
> deletes don't get
> flushed so efficiently, as Richard suggests.  If
> that was the case then
> I can't explain why an index rebuild can cause an
> index to shrink by 30%
> or more.  And recent experience still shows that a
> rebuild can cause
> significant performance improvement.  And Oracle has
> provided the
> capability to rebuild indexes which is not trivial. 
> Therefore, NEVER
> use the word "never" unless your absolutely certain
> that under all
> circumstances it will be absolutely true.  And in
> the current context,
> that is the truth, that is, never can never be an
> absolute.
> 
> BTW: Since we've a few "myth busters" in the group. 
> I appreciate the
> effort these people put into "myth busting", even if
> they are later
> proven to have erred.  At a very minimum they start
> discussion and
> re-examination of commonly held beliefs that can
> have changed or lost
> significance over the years(like it's best to have
> all of a tables data
> in the first extent).  Such discussion, although
> sometimes the start of
> "Holy Wars", is healthy (not the Holy War though)
> and a necessary part
> of all of us growing.  That being said, let it be
> noted that I agree to
> disagree, in part, with Mr Foote.
> 
> 
> Dick Goulet
> Senior Oracle DBA
> Oracle Certified 8i DBA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@xxxxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 12:44 PM
> To: oraclel@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Index rebuilding
> 
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:49:46 +0100, Karsten Weikop
> <oraclel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Please read the execellent paper from Richard
> Foote (which can be
> > downloaded from Miracle's site):
> >
>
http://www.miracleas.dk/images/upload/Docs/Richard%20Foote.pdf
> > Conclusion form this paper: Never Rebuild, but
> find the course to the
> > problem.
> 
> Never?
> 
> I think you will find that statement as difficult to
> support as
> 'always rebuild'.
> 
> --=20
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 

--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: