There is no such list because ASM is part of the database. If the database is supported on the platform in question, ASM will use the same write to disk mechanism that the database does. Bottom line - if the database is certified then so too is ASM. Now if you were talking of multi-pathing capabilites or such, that's a different issue. Pete -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: Re: ASM platform availability? Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from rgmum104.us.oracle.com by rgmum104.us.oracle.com with ESMTP id 4737237851105359690; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:21:30 -0700 Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com by rgmum104.us.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2386293501105359666; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:21:06 -0700 Received: from agminet02.oracle.com (agminet02.oracle.com [141.146.126.229]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j0ACL6b9007175 for <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:21:06 -0700 Received: from agminet02.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agminet02.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j0ACL6Id000339 for <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:21:06 -0800 Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) by agminet02.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j0ACL4Iv000306 for <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:21:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3260A72C5B4; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:21:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07639-62; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:21:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id DD4E672CC31; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:21:01 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=JasyxW9hsC5VGSCYNYlGk6nB6Z1ks2hLROMCVy2TZ8GpadPSMjezqdVfBGGnyQGThtFKRY3bYQFtB6RwsuSethjDfLMupl+dUu+qeGp2m4uLf+cFn5SnQ5v93RSNF7WM4BJhGPUXTi9enJ5FY2pEwbEV43rcBgNm3LrP3c8c85o= Message-ID: <d6bad08005011004194ac3866d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:19:16 -0500 From: mhthomas <qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx> To: tim@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: ASM platform availability? Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx In-Reply-To: <20041228010012.M94103@xxxxxxxxx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <20041227213648.M62496@xxxxxxxxx> <be592d550412271344588bdeb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041228010012.M94103@xxxxxxxxx> X-archive-position: 14526 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx X-original-sender: qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx Precedence: normal Reply-To: qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at freelists.org Hi, Another year has passed and I'm curious if anyone knows the answer to your question, yet? Regards, Mike Thomas On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:00:12 -0700, tim <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > Anyway, I was hoping that someone had found a super-secret magical list of > supported platforms for ASM that isn't found in the usual place on MetaLink? > Or perhaps there's someone on this list who knows? Or someone on this list > knows someone who knows? > > > > There doesn't seem to be any mention of ASM on MetaLink's "Certify And > > > Availability" pages. Perhaps I'm not looking in the right places? > > > > > > > > > Specifically, I'm trying to find out if ASM is currently supported on > > > HP-UX, both PA-RISC (11.11) and Itanium (11.23) platforms? -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l