Re: ASM platform availability?

There is no such list because ASM is part of the database.  If the database is 
supported on the platform in question, ASM will use the same write to disk 
mechanism that the database does.  Bottom line - if the database is certified 
then so too is ASM.
Now if you were talking of multi-pathing capabilites or such, that's a 
different issue.


-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: Re: ASM platform availability?

Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from by
        with ESMTP id 4737237851105359690; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:21:30 -0700
Received: from by
        with ESMTP id 2386293501105359666; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:21:06 -0700
Received: from ( [])
        by (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id 
        for <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:21:06 -0700
Received: from (localhost [])
        by (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id 
        for <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:21:06 -0800
Received: from ( [])
        by (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id 
        for <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:21:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [])
        by (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP 
id 3260A72C5B4;
        Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:21:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ([])
 by localhost (turing []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 07639-62; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:21:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [])
        by (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP 
id DD4E672CC31;
        Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:21:01 -0500 (EST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
Message-ID: <d6bad08005011004194ac3866d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:19:16 -0500
From: mhthomas <qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tim@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ASM platform availability?
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <20041228010012.M94103@xxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <20041227213648.M62496@xxxxxxxxx>
X-archive-position: 14526
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-original-sender: qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx
Precedence: normal
Reply-To: qnxodba@xxxxxxxxx
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at


Another year has passed and I'm curious if anyone knows the answer to
your question, yet?


Mike Thomas

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:00:12 -0700, tim <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyway, I was hoping that someone had found a super-secret magical list of
> supported platforms for ASM that isn't found in the usual place on MetaLink?
> Or perhaps there's someone on this list who knows?  Or someone on this list
> knows someone who knows?
> > > There doesn't seem to be any mention of ASM on MetaLink's "Certify And
> > > Availability" pages.  Perhaps I'm not looking in the right places?
> > >
> > >
> > > Specifically, I'm trying to find out if ASM is currently supported on
> > > HP-UX, both PA-RISC (11.11) and Itanium (11.23) platforms?


Other related posts: