RE: 9205 to 9206
- From: "david hill" <david.hill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "oracle list" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:50:31 -0400
With 9206 on RHEL 3 you need
Patch 4059639 - ALL RAC NODES WERE TERMINATED AFTER
ORA-7445[SKGXPDMPCTX+402]
Patch 3238244 - fix your agent
And
Patch 3208258 - for you Asynch IO
You could always check out docid 283899.1 for known issues
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Hall
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:40 AM
To: oracle list
Subject: Re: 9205 to 9206
Two positive notes:
1. It seemed to fix some CBO issues that we had been experiencing (we
were on 9.2.0.5 with 9.2.0.6 core patch, and that version seemed far
more prone to choosing ridiculous execution paths than when we were on
"pure" 9.2.0.5 or 9.2.0.6).
2. It eliminated a RAC-specific ORA-600 bug in one of our more
database-intensive batch processes.
Two bugs noted:
1. If you have a view that is SELECT ROWID, * from some_table, you
can no longer INSERT into such a view on 9.2.0.6.
2. One of our other teams found a new bug with database links (I'm
sorry I don't recall the details).
There was also a third bug that caused an instance shutdown when the
host machine was heavily utilized. Apparently this was a known bug
and fixed in 9.2.0.7. It has only happened to us once in 2 months but
it is enough to make us paranoid about machine loads...
HTH
Tim
On 8/17/05, Loughmiller, Greg <greg.loughmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Seems to be stable.. Fixed a few of the 9205 perf issues as well as
some
> streams issues.. And finally, you can avoid using any one off patches
if you
> are in a RAC environment with 9206. So far, early testing on 9206/RAC
shows
> all is well
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: raja rao [mailto:raja4list@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 2:43 PM
> To: oracle list
> Subject: 9205 to 9206
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
> we are planning to migrate from 9205 to 9206 (oracle apps 11.5.10).
>
>
>
>
>
> is 9206 stable compare with 9205 ?
>
>
>
>
>
> anybody encountered any issues ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Raj
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named as recipient. Any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately notify us and delete your copy. Thank you.
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Les informations contenues aux présentes sont de nature privilégiée et
confidentielle. Elles ne peuvent être utilisées que par la personne ou
l'entité dont le nom paraît comme destinataire. Si le lecteur du présent
message n'est pas le destinataire prévu, il est par les présentes prié de
noter qu'il est strictement interdit de divulguer, de distribuer ou de
copier ce message. Si ce message vous a été transmis par mégarde, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement et supprimer votre copie. Merci.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
