RE: 10g ORACLE HOME
- From: "Marquez, Chris" <CMarquez@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mjalsing@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:53:33 -0500
Also if you install the 10g "Companion CD", or as I like to call it
"Disk 2" (contains; java, apache, HTML DB, etc.), it must go under its
own Oracle home.
Seems 10g "Companion CD" contains 9i versions of some software.
Chris Marquez
Oracle DBA
HEYMONitor(tm) - heymonitor.com
"Oracle Monitoring & Alerting Solution"
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Breitling
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:11 PM
To: mjalsing@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 10g ORACLE HOME
If you don't like the "1" you may as well get rid of the entire db_1=20
suffix.
I have actually adopted this nomenclature for new Oracle 9i servers I am
setting up and install 9i into two homes ...product/9.2.0/db1 and db2. I
can then upgrade each home separately and migrate databases to the=20
upgrade one by one. I just need to make sure I migrate all to the=20
"higher" home before I need to install a new patchset (or else add a 3rd
home).
Manmohan Jalsingh wrote:
> Is there any purpose for the number '1' added to "db" in the=3D20=20
> ORACLE_HOME e.g. /usr3/apl/oracle/product/10.1.0/db_1. If we=3D20 =
simply
> use "db", do you think it will have anylimitations in future.
>=20
--=20
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
