[optimal] Re: No more infiltrations....
- From: "Cavicchi, Robert" <Robert.Cavicchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:46:50 +0000
This topic is absolutely perfect for a submission.
2014 OPS Scientific Paper Session in Chicago.
Never too early to start writing it up and submitting.
bob
From: <Stuart>, "<B. Alfred>", <B.S.>, <C.R.A.>, "O.C.T-C"
<stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: Optimal <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, November 22, 2013 7:55 AM
To: Optimal <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [optimal] Re: No more infiltrations....
These sound like fertile ground for a paper presentation.
Stuart Alfred, B.S., C.R.A., O.C.T.-C
528 North Bauman Street
Indianapolis, IN 46214
stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stuart.alfred@xxxxxxxxx>
317 517-9455 cell
www.stuartalfred.com
From: "Steffens, Timothy"
<tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:33 AM
To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [optimal] Re: No more infiltrations....
Pretty cool. I found another interesting article about a model eye for OCT or
as they call it a "phantom tissue." It can be used for training, calibration,
device certification and evaluation of various OCT models.
http://www.bioopticsworld.com/articles/print/volume-6/issue-6/features/optical-coherence-tomography-tissue-phantoms-a-physical-eye-model-for-oct.html
Tim Steffens, CRA
Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
1000 Wall Street
Ann Arbor, MI
P: 734-936-2283
tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Sandor Ferenczy
<sandorferenczy@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sandorferenczy@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:57 PM
To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [optimal] Re: No more infiltrations....
There are a few different devices out like that.
This one is head-held and portable:
http://www.bioopticsworld.com/articles/print/volume-6/issue-6/features/biomedical-device-design-development-borrowed-components-for-cost-effective-imaging-devices.html
i think most of them work on NIR imaging. It would be interesting to see the
success/failures and what criteria is linked to them (skin tone, subcutaneous
fat, ischemia, etc)
-sandor
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Anton Drew
<anton.drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:anton.drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
We could have done with a pair of those over the past week, we have had a run of
obese diabetics with "a lot of padding", women with compromised veins from
chemo, old people with highly
mobile tiny veins, and one extravasation.
Wonder what the price is ???? =o
Anton Drew
On 21/11/2013, at 7:17 AM, Steffens, Timothy wrote:
I found this on Digg. Pretty cool
http://youtu.be/3IjagQmeh08
Here's the company website
http://evenamed.com/evena_for/hospital
Thanks,
Tim Steffens, CRA
Director of Ophthalmic Imaging
University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
1000 Wall Street
Ann Arbor, MI
P: 734-936-2283<tel:734-936-2283>
tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tjsteffe@xxxxxxxxx>
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
used for urgent or sensitive issues
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
used for urgent or sensitive issues
Other related posts:
