[optimal] Re: Heidelberg UWF lens

  • From: "Eric Kegley" <ekegley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:42:14 -0500

LOL Sandor. We did some comparison of images with the Zeiss FF3 and our
Optos when we first got it. Patients would seem to have BDR without ischemia
until we looked in the far periphery and noted small areas of ischemia with
associated NVE.


Thanks,

EK



Eric Kegley, CRA, COA

Director of Ophthalmic Imaging

Retina Consultants of Houston

6560 Fannin St., Suite 750

Houston, TX 77030



Main 713 524-3434

Direct 713 394-7531

Fax 713 524-3220

<http://www.houstonretina.com/> www.houstonretina.com

<http://www.facebook.com/RetinaConsultantsofHouston>
www.facebook.com/RetinaConsultantsofHouston




_____

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sandor Ferenczy
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 1:38 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: Heidelberg UWF lens


...maybe some of them are the ones that missed peripheral disease and
retired early...



-sandor


from the land of "there is retina beyond the equator"



On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:58 PM, David Bennett <dbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


It is a nice lens, takes nice pictures, and it has its place but I guess I
am from the old school. Give me the fine detail of a 30 degree image any
day.

Where have all the retina docs gone that would not even look at images
wider than 35 degrees?

Guess the old school docs have retired also just like us older imagers!!!!

David B. Bennett
VCU/Medical College of Virginia
Department of Ophthalmology
Diagnostic Imaging Division
Richmond, Virginia
dbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx





Windows bitmap

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. optimal
  3. Archive
  4. 06-2015