No, I think they were relying on our skill in getting peripheral shots without
the fancy lenses
I for one, appreciate the ease of use
I can still get the peripheral shots
But this lens sure helps
I use a Lenstar LS900 biometer and love it for all of those reasons
There are many reasons I go back to immersion as well
Tools, they separate us from the animals, not diminish our skill set….
D.
Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS
Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center
CPMC Department of Ophthalmology
2100 Webster Street Suite 212
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 600-3937 FAX (415) 600-6563
From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sandor Ferenczy
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 11:38 AM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: Heidelberg UWF lens
...maybe some of them are the ones that missed peripheral disease and retired
early...
-sandor
from the land of "there is retina beyond the equator"
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:58 PM, David Bennett
<dbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
It is a nice lens, takes nice pictures, and it has its place but I guess I am
from the old school. Give me the fine detail of a 30 degree image any day.
Where have all the retina docs gone that would not even look at images wider
than 35 degrees?
Guess the old school docs have retired also just like us older imagers!!!!
David B. Bennett
VCU/Medical College of Virginia
Department of Ophthalmology
Diagnostic Imaging Division
Richmond, Virginia
dbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
