[opendtv] Re: NBC turning flagship O&O into 24/7 news channel
- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:39:48 -0700
You can imagine to be clueless and wrong. Imagine a channel of local
weathercasts from all over the country. That would have more merit than
slim tranches of cats in the trees stories from all over the u.s. imagine
the coverage during sweeps periods!
Ever hear of p.m. magazine/evening magazine from Westinghouse broadcasting?
That only lasted a few years, but they quickly found out that the stories
didn't work until they were re-fashioned for a national audience, and the
cost of the reword made the whole system unprofitable.
'the world is a smaller place' was trite around the same time that 'Visit to
a Small Planet' was first shown on TV. More than 50 years ago. I could go
off here on the foolishness of Marshall McLuhan and the 'global village' but
we're beyond that -- the only people covering the quake in China on the
scene with broadcast quality equipment is NPR, which just happened to be
there.
John Willkie
-----Mensaje original-----
De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Tom Barry
Enviado el: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:31 AM
Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [opendtv] Re: NBC turning flagship O&O into 24/7 news channel
A certain small percentage of local news has national interest. You
would think that if you had and shared a whole network of local news
channels you would also have enough content for one 24/7 national news
channel for viewers with a wider interest.
The world is a smaller place these days.
- Tom
James Albro wrote:
> I see the WNBC announcement as more the "msNBCization" of local news. The
> business plan behind msNBC was to take an underutilized resource (NBC
News)
> that had to be paid for in any case and gain any additional revenue
> available by reusing the product on a 24 hour news channel. New York City
> (and most other big to medium size cities) already have local news
channels,
> so there's obviously some revenue available for local full-time news. The
> WNBC move would allow NBC to pick up some of that revenue with news
> production product that's already been paid for.
>
> The other speculation (replace the NBC affiliate network entertainment
> programming with 24/7 news) has already been tried by KRON in San
Francisco,
> with disastrous results.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Birkmaier" <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:43 AM
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: NBC turning flagship O&O into 24/7 news channel
>
>
>> At 10:26 PM -0400 5/12/08, Jim Albro wrote:
>>> Where does it say that the entertainment programing will be affected?
>>> According to Broadcasting & Cable the 24/7 news channel will be a
>>> DTV subchannel and available on cable digital tiers, just like
>>> WeatherPLUS. I imagine it will replace the current WNBC-DT channel
>>> 4.3, which currently carries endless reruns of "wine country"
>>> travelogues from KNTV.
>> You're right Jim. It does not say that the entertainment programming
>> will be affected and it is logical that they would carry the News
>> Channel as a sub-channel on the digital broadcasts. But the story
>> also suggests that the entire broadcast operation could go away, as
>> the real play here is to get more content onto cable.
>>
>> I would not be surprised if within 5 years NBC pulled the plug on
>> broadcast operations and goes direct with cable and DBS across the
>> country, possibly opening up more regional content centers to feed a
>> national 24/7 news operation.
>>
>> The article notes the declining profitability of local stations. Much
>> of this has to do with the local news audience, but it is also
>> rippling into all of the programming outside of prime time - and
>> prime time ratings are down substantially as well.
>>
>> If NBC were to move to cable distribution, they would pick up all of
>> the non-prime time inventory that is now filled with syndicated
>> programming. They could easily fill up that time with shows that
>> would develop talent for higher profile shows...
>>
>> We could even see the networks get back into the game show business.
>>
>> Funny how the old saw - "what goes around comes around" seems to apply.
>>
>> Looks like broadcasting is returning to the heady days of the '50s,
>> only this time on the way down instead of the way up.
>>
>> Regards
>> Craig
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>>
>> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
> FreeLists.org
>> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
--
Tom Barry trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
