> > What kills spectral efficiency, in what you > > describe, is NOT the big stick. It is instead > > having separate markets close together. Craig Birkmaier wrote: > > How did I not see this. The problem is where > people live, not the DTV infrastructure Try to think this through, Craig, for once. If people all over the country watch the same nationwide channels, why do you have to restrict the OTA coverage to little cookie-cutter zones? Show me where Paris and 30-mile distant Mantes are separate markets requiring separate TV programs. So because they use low power transmitters, they had to use up more frequencies in order to install translators. Even low power transmitters cause interference in adjacent markets, you know. That's why they use translators in Paris and Mantes. Bigger sticks, or SFNs, would have needed only one frequency for each program channel. I'm not advocating nationwide SFNs, of course. That would be silly. But I do expect you to make sensible arguments based on reality, and to understand the concept of multiple viable solutions to a problem. In the US, we do have legitimately separate markets close together (thanks to the FCC caps). But they are also huge markets, requiring wide coverage. Not so hard to understand, right? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.