It seems that this order simply prolongs the completion of cable's DTV transition, which seems rather odd, considering the FCC's supposed interest in completing the broadcaster's DTV transition as quickly as is practical. The either/or option of maintaining an analog tier or going all-digital only when all subs have the necessary equipment is also puzzling. Does the order require MSOs to foot the bill for all those STBs if he is anxious to eliminate analog sooner rather than later? If so, how ironic that this order comes on the heels of a previous order that requires MSOs to spend a lot more money on each STB by forcing the CA separation and the purchasing of CableCards. The sum total of both orders looks like a massive tax on cable MSOs with little or no improvement in service to subscribers. Wonderful. Rather than allowing cable MSOs to follow their own business plans to add more and more HD channels and to increase broadband speeds -- in other words, their plans to increase the service offerings on the digital tier while decreasing the offerings on the analog tier -- the FCC has ORDERED that the MSOs change their plans and remain stuck in the past for a few years longer. A fine example of an anti-progress ruling by the government. The U.S. is already lagging other industrialized nations on broadband penetration. This ruling will only make that worse, by prolonging cable's digital spectrum shortage. -- Frank Eory