John Shutt wrote: > Enter the FCC tuner mandate. What this has done is to force > manufacturers to include an ATSC tuner into their sets. I'm still miffed that the FCC forced Americans to buy UHF tuners, back in the early 1960s. > However, once you do that, you have 90% of what you need to > also include a QAM tuner for digital cable. Currently, cable > companies are relying on cable boxes to control access to the > expanded digital tier of service. With the recent availability > of so many digital cable ready television sets, how long > before they begin to encrypt those digital channels as well? There should be no logical reason for cable companies to encrypt what channels are available FOTA, at the very least, right? At least not for cable outlets in private homes, where the homeowner or renter needs to pay for the cable anyway. In apartments, the cable company could, in principle, control whether an apartment gets a live cable feed or not, just like they do in private homes. I know some apartments provide live cable feeds always, but that should really be up to the cable company. This is why the new Samsung plain-jane STB sells well here (well, sells out regularly anyway). It allows cable subscribers to receive HDTV from all local channels without having to pay extra over their existing cable subscription fee. Who knows. That could be why retailers are "encouraged" to keep very few in stock. That $125 price John Limpert saw is impressively low, considering that the common wisdom held that ATSC tuners would add "hundreds of dollars" to the price of cheap sets. An optimist sees one negative truism after another being knocked down. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.