[openbeosmediakit] Re: [music-dsp] VST standard (fwd)
- From: "Frans van Nispen" <xlr8@xxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeosmediakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:41:14 +0200
I have written two mails to Steinberg as Xentronix, pointing
out the recreation of BeOS.
So Far no response.
Frans van Nispen.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: openbeosmediakit-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openbeosmediakit-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Namens David Shipman
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 augustus 2002 1:25
Aan: openbeosmediakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Onderwerp: [openbeosmediakit] [music-dsp] VST standard (fwd)
Cross-posted due to quietness of mediakit list...
See the message attached below, from the music-dsp mailing list.
I think it is absolutely vital for OBOS as a media platform to have
VST3 support,
has anyone contacted Steinberg yet=3F (note : I haven't done so myself
because I know that individuals making (sometimes conflicting)
suggestions can do a lot more harm than good... although I've signed up
for the VST dev list...)
------ Forwarded message: ------
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:01:44 +0200 (MEST)
From: Bram De Jong <Bram.DeJong@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <music-dsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [music-dsp] VST standard [was : 32 bit floats in VST mixing
systems]
Reply-To: music-dsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Russell Borogove wrote:
>
> Yeah, IMO, the VST spec is badly written on this
> point, and the VST developer/user communities should
> continue to exert "evolutionary pressure" on host
> developers to ensure that this is how things work
> going forward.
>
Steinberg is writing the specs for VST 3.0 as we speak. Anyone who has
something interesting to say about the standard should try joining the
vst plugins list RIGHT NOW!!
Other related posts:
