I have written two mails to Steinberg as Xentronix, pointing out the recreation of BeOS. So Far no response. Frans van Nispen. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: openbeosmediakit-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openbeosmediakit-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]Namens David Shipman Verzonden: vrijdag 30 augustus 2002 1:25 Aan: openbeosmediakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Onderwerp: [openbeosmediakit] [music-dsp] VST standard (fwd) Cross-posted due to quietness of mediakit list... See the message attached below, from the music-dsp mailing list. I think it is absolutely vital for OBOS as a media platform to have VST3 support, has anyone contacted Steinberg yet=3F (note : I haven't done so myself because I know that individuals making (sometimes conflicting) suggestions can do a lot more harm than good... although I've signed up for the VST dev list...) ------ Forwarded message: ------ Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:01:44 +0200 (MEST) From: Bram De Jong <Bram.DeJong@xxxxxxxxx> To: <music-dsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [music-dsp] VST standard [was : 32 bit floats in VST mixing systems] Reply-To: music-dsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Russell Borogove wrote: > > Yeah, IMO, the VST spec is badly written on this > point, and the VST developer/user communities should > continue to exert "evolutionary pressure" on host > developers to ensure that this is how things work > going forward. > Steinberg is writing the specs for VST 3.0 as we speak. Anyone who has something interesting to say about the standard should try joining the vst plugins list RIGHT NOW!!