[nvda-addons] Re: RFC: don't use the repository README as add-on user documentation
- From: Mesar Hameed <mesar.hameed@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nvda-addons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 08:10:42 +0000
Hi,
On Fri 05/09/14,13:11, Rui Batista wrote:
> > No dia 05/09/2014, às 09:31, Mesar Hameed escreveu:
> > Do you agree that branches t2694, t2694-2 and next should now be deleted?
> > I hope I didn't overlook some functionality.
> >
> Yes, dn’t need them at all.
Just to update this thread, I have now deleted the three mensioned
branches. The template should be safe to role out since NVDA now
includes the #2694 changes that we were waiting for.
thanks,
Mesar
----------------------------------------------------------------
NVDA add-ons: A list to discuss add-on code enhancements and for reporting bugs.
Community addons are available from: http://addons.nvda-project.org
To send a message to the list: nvda-addons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your list settings/unsubscribe:
//www.freelists.org/list/nvda-addons
To contact list moderators: nvda-addons-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
- » [nvda-addons] Re: RFC: don't use the repository README as add-on user documentation - Mesar Hameed
