[networkku] Re: Zenob
- From: PAUL HUSE <HUSE@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'networkku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <networkku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:18:51 -0500
As was with Gagik, Aiko and Azhole, Zenob has been added back into the fold
and is on a 2-week pseudo-candidacy period before he can start spending
points. He returned at the right time as he can grind to 70 without missing
raids.
--
Mig
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Langevin [mailto:langevin73100@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 10:25 AM
To: networkku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [networkku] Re: Zenob
As you said, with the amount of time I have put in, I don't think I will
have to reapply...if I do...whatever. Like I said, I am not gonna be on
every single nite getting into raids and what not, if I am on, I am on.
My biggest problem is that I still need ALL of GoD flags, and xegony, rathe
and cornaiv for time so I am far far behind the rest.
We shall see
Rob
Zenob
Gagik Draygonbayne <gagik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If I had to do a whole candidacy again, I'd go ED or TA.
-G-
-----Original Message-----
From: networkku-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:networkku-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Don Wallace
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 12:24 AM
To: networkku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [networkku] Re: Zenob
The inactive policy came out this summer, with very little fan fair. Moosla
almost fell victim to it. I would have argued against it, but it was
published Fait Accompli before i was aware of it. Im just a raid helper, not
an officer. I would certainly argue the case to the officers that I think
hes deserving of full reinstatement.
Glean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gagik Draygonbayne"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: [networkku] Re: Zenob
> I thought Zenob would have put in enough time and effort back in the day
not
> to have to be a candidate again. I would understand the loot policy and
him
> not being able to bid for x period of time, but as to having to do a whole
> candidacy again, that is just plain wrong.
>
> Must give up the respect for those who did the heavy lifting in olden
times.
>
> -G-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: networkku-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:networkku-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Don Wallace
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 5:12 PM
> To: networkku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [networkku] Re: Zenob
>
>
> Welcome back man! Its good to see ya around again. What do you want to do
in
> terms of SA membership? There is a new Inactive Member policy, which says
> you can come back but you will have to start as a candidate again. Since
you
> still do meet membership requirements I think its just a matter of doing
the
> 30 days, 75 points. To get it started you probably need to do an
> application, or do a post, or PM Kavis.
>
> Now that Zenob is back for real, we can probably get you flag caught up
> within that 30 day time.
>
> See ya in game doood!
>
> Glean
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Langevin"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 4:35 PM
> Subject: [networkku] Re: Zenob
>
>
> > The real zenob has installed the game, loaded and purchased OOW, and is
> playing on a much less in depth level. I will play like the old days on
> fridays and saturdays but my weekdays will not allow it.
> >
> > As was expected, the wonderful Client Crash issue that many are
> experiencing I managed to have also. Three in just under an hour and a
> half. Oh well...welcome back I guess.
> >
> > Rob Langevin
> > Zenob
> > Gagik Draygonbayne wrote:
> > The real Zenob returned to EQ?
> >
> > -G-
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: networkku-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:networkku-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of PAUL HUSE
> > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:00 PM
> > To: 'networkku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: [networkku] Zenob
> >
> >
> > I understand there was a sighting today... I believe there may be a
> petition
> > to change the surname "Mooslablowsme"
> >
> >
> > --
> > Migue
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 08/27/2004
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 08/27/2004
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 08/27/2004
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 08/27/2004
>
>
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 08/27/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 08/27/2004
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
Other related posts:
