[ncsc-moths] Re: Fw: Sallow question

  • From: Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:13:59 -0800 (PST)

Hi Doug,
 
Thanks for the email. I really enjoy the S95 and D90. I use the S95 when I 
digiscope, and I am able to take some great photos and pics. When I can, I use 
my S95. But, when I need to take photos quickly, am walking in the woods, am 
mothing, etc. I use the D90. It is a great camera, and I have been using it for 
2 or so years now. Not very heavy, easy to carry around when in the woods 
looking for wildlife- an ideal camera for wildlife watching. And when I put my 
macro lens on, the pics I take are breath-taking.
 
Cheers,
Kyle
 

________________________________
 From: Doug Allen <dougk4ly@xxxxxxxxx>
To: ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 9:30 PM
Subject: [ncsc-moths] Re: Fw: Sallow question
  

Hi Kyle,

  Nothing I find on MPG, BG, or in my Peterson shows the beautiful violet sheen 
of your picture although Peterson mentions it.  The October 9 date seems right 
for Unsated.  
Maybe some one familiar with the species will have some comments.  
How do you like the Canon PS S95 and the Nikon P90?
Happy New Year everyone!

Doug Allen  Windmill Hill, SC 


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

Hey everyone,
> 
>I sent out this email several weeks ago but never heard any response. Any 
>ideas on this species?
> 
>Thanks, and happy new year! Kyle
>
> 
>----- Forwarded Message -----
>From: Kyle Kittelberger <kkturtledude@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: Moth List <ncsc-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:42 PM
>Subject: [ncsc-moths] Sallow question
>  
>
>Hey everyone,
>
>I forgot I took this picture in the northeast. I know it is a sallow, and I 
>believe it might be Unsated Sallow (Metaxaglaea inulta), but wanted some 
>input. This was taken in a bog in Vermont. 
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/hawk-eagle/8267986786/in/photostream
>
>Thanks,
>Kyle 
>
>  

Other related posts: