[ncolug] Re: Robert's Rootkit
- From: MrKnisely <mrknisely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ncolug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:41:05 -0500
nor thern wrote:
upon running chkrootkit on command line,it recognizes
known rootkits that enable remote exploit of a system.
http://www.chkrootkit.org/
Roberts Rules would allow remote exploit of our group.
Rest in peace ,Robert. died May 11,1923
http://www.roberts-rules.com/parl16.htmwo
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
Be sure to visit our web at www.ncolug.org
It is important to remember that these rules of order are completely
flexable to the group. You can create your own internal rules that
supecede the Roberts rules:
"...and in which they are not inconsistent with these bylaws and any
special rules of order that WPLUG may adopt."
That being said these rules CAN allow someone to disrupt the meeting;
however, given the small size of our gourp these attempts can be easily
be thwarted.
Now, to the rootkit anology itself. A rootkit hides itself from the
system. With these rules, there is no hiding. There is open debate.
Everything is done in the open.
It's obvious that you have some specific ideas where this might be used
to abuse the rights of others. What are those concerns? Let's shape
some of our own rules, which supersede the Roberts Rules, to fix these
loopholes you see.
I suggest a rule that would premit a 2/3 vote by the Boadrd of Directors
to suspend the Roberts Rules at their discression.
Mike K.
Be sure to visit our web at www.ncolug.org
Other related posts:
