[nanomsg] Re: Status

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:10:00 +0100

On 2014-03-04 12:56, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
 /*  The latest revision of the current interface. */
-#define NN_VERSION_REVISION 1
+#define NN_VERSION_REVISION 2


I believe this should be zero. But If it's too late, it won't hurt.


Hmm, I think I can agree with that. Martin said it was okay, though.

Martin?
My bad. The revision should have dropped to 0. However, if you already made the package, keeping it at 2 doesn't really hurt anything (it just looks like we've skipped 2 versions). 

It's your call.
Martin

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. nanomsg
  3. Archive
  4. 03-2014