[nanomsg] Re: Status
- From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 17:34:01 +0200
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > So two pull requests left. They are pretty trivial. But the
> > question is license issue. You have requested either statement in
> > each patch, or the personal email that all following patches of the
> > author will be MIT licensed. So should you publish a list of such
> > authors? Or we just require statement in every patch? (Or is this
> > rule already obsolete?)
>
> You should ask people to provide a statement that they are submitting
> the patch under MIT license.
>
> Every such person is added to thr AUTHORS file.
>
>
Done. So let's make the release.
--
Paul
Other related posts:
