[nanomsg] Re: Routing plan
- From: Chuck Remes <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:14:47 -0500
On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:21 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As for devices, I would go for basically the same thing we had in 0MQ: int
> nn_device (int s1, int s2);
>
> [snip]
>
> As for executables, it's trivial to just invoke the nn_device function so
> it's probably not worth shipping the executables.
I suggest that you reconsider this. In the 0mq community, we have removed and
re-added the device functionality 2 or 3 times. The community always demands it
back. It might be trivial to implement by user code, but it is quite convenient
to have it in the library.
cr
Other related posts:
