[nanomsg] Re: Routing plan
- From: Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:18:07 +0100
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree that devices do not need to be part of the core, they are easy enough
> to implement on top of any bindings and would just clutter the core.
Are we talking about the function or the executables now?
I always liked included devices, because it allows me to easily use a
high-performance device in even while using a binding in a
higher-level language. And with the stricter topology, it sounds like
having devices in the core makes even more sense.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Other related posts:
